tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post115310540666512992..comments2024-02-17T09:02:22.902+00:00Comments on Jake Watch | Stalking Jake Gyllenhaal Daily: PROPHECY GIRL WATCHES ESPN!britpopbabyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04444074574966465657noreply@blogger.comBlogger87125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-37807493482488682122012-11-14T16:05:25.123+00:002012-11-14T16:05:25.123+00:00clomid 50 mg side effects | where to buy clomid on...clomid 50 mg side effects | <a href="http://cheapclomidonline.webs.com/#14816" rel="nofollow">where to buy clomid online</a> - clomid medicine, clomid second roundAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-56322557831753543082010-07-16T17:03:20.790+01:002010-07-16T17:03:20.790+01:00take a look at my new site -
[url=http://www.youn...take a look at my new site -<br /><br />[url=http://www.young-dro.com/profiles/blogs/buy-cheap-effexor-effexor-xr] effexor xr [/url]<br /><br />http://www.young-dro.com/profiles/blogs/buy-cheap-effexor-effexor-xr <br />[url=http://www.young-dro.com/profiles/blogs/buy-cheap-effexor-effexor-xr] alcohol drinking effexor [/url]Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-22735380327993595332010-07-16T13:37:11.495+01:002010-07-16T13:37:11.495+01:00get to know our video site -
[url=http://trailfir...get to know our video site -<br /><br />[url=http://trailfire.com/ambien] buy ambien without a prescription [/url]<br /><br />http://trailfire.com/ambien<br />[url=http://trailfire.com/ambien] ambien eating [/url]Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-9561408535054737652010-07-15T18:52:26.681+01:002010-07-15T18:52:26.681+01:00get to know my favorite site -
[url=http://trailf...get to know my favorite site -<br /><br />[url=http://trailfire.com/amoxicillin] amoxicillin birth control [/url]<br /><br />http://trailfire.com/amoxicillin <br />[url=http://trailfire.com/amoxicillin] amoxicillin alcohol [/url]Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-778172536564881602010-07-15T14:29:23.126+01:002010-07-15T14:29:23.126+01:00see our first blog -
[url=http://trailfire.com/le...see our first blog -<br /><br />[url=http://trailfire.com/lewismorrison] phentermine alternatives [/url]<br /><br />http://trailfire.com/lewismorrison<br />[url=http://trailfire.com/lewismorrison] phentermine side effects [/url]Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153560430584690582006-07-22T10:27:00.000+01:002006-07-22T10:27:00.000+01:00Yeah and why is it taking it in the rear a 'SICKO'...Yeah and why is it taking it in the rear a 'SICKO' idea, MR Lance Armstrong? You're a jerk and that was a homophobic remark in my own opinion and several others apparently. What an emabarassment he was - the ESPYs lost a SLEWWWWWWWWWwwwwwwwwwww of peopel over that and a ton of intergrity. Niec way to kill a show Armstrong. Then to tell half the audience they'll get cancer - sweet - you're the second coming of fricking host hell. Get the frickin Hollywood out of your eyes Armstrong and stick to a bike or sports you wannabe.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153560135667238882006-07-22T10:22:00.000+01:002006-07-22T10:22:00.000+01:00Lance AND Jake had brain farts that evening - firs...Lance AND Jake had brain farts that evening - first for Lance to even think that joke would be a good idea, and then Jake reasuring Lance thats its cool with him - WTF!?!?!?! Jake of all people has rolled his own eyes over the gay related jokes and then he thinks its okay for his friend to embarass himself and him? Jake probably wanted to seem all cool about it and not lose his brand new super cool buddy Lance. idiots. For god sakes now Matthew looks more dignified than these two!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153269634756424972006-07-19T01:40:00.000+01:002006-07-19T01:40:00.000+01:00You might have a beef with Lance as you put it but...You might have a beef with Lance as you put it but Jake agreed to it.So how is he any better or worse then Lance?At the end of the day,it's a boys joke,between friends but unfortunately not everyone will see it like that and i don't blame them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153263889319999702006-07-19T00:04:00.000+01:002006-07-19T00:04:00.000+01:00If a lot of people are down on Jake(No pun intende...If a lot of people are down on Jake(No pun intended) after the ESPY's,<BR/>does this mean the end of Jake watch as we know it?How can people that ONCE liked him before the ESPY charade still come here?There would be no point.So,if he pissed anybody off,then go too another blog!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153246032348565892006-07-18T19:07:00.000+01:002006-07-18T19:07:00.000+01:00Yes,have to say it has had a lot of negative press...Yes,have to say it has had a lot of negative press.I can take a joke,and i have a good sense of humour but i can also see it from the other side and how some people could be offended,although the joke was directed at Jake.Lance was on E' and backstage he said he ran it by Jake first as he didn't wanna do that to him out there and according to Lance who did a Jake impression he said "I love it,i love it."(Jake said that)and the gay book reading?What was all that about?Oh well,tomorrow it will be yesterdays news.Literally.lolAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153244638419278012006-07-18T18:43:00.000+01:002006-07-18T18:43:00.000+01:00(I'm anon 9:31pm from above) I wasn't aware until ...(I'm anon 9:31pm from above) I wasn't aware until now that Jake "loved" the joke, but I knew he was in on it and had to approve it and I'm honestly not very surpised that he did. Going by TV interviews, I can see Jake as the type that might have that brand of boyish/crude humor. Sort of a no holds barred, everything is game type. As much as we might feel that we know him, we don't. We don't know his own personal sense of humor and what he might find acceptable or funny. I would hope that if he did find it objectionable he wouldn't have agreed to it, that would really be worse, imo. <BR/><BR/>My feeling is that jokes of that sort might be ok between friends where each knows the others bounds, but not for national television. I think they genuinely thought (or hoped) people would have an innocent laugh over it, at least their target audience, which is whom they were catering to. Course, as we see now, not everyone did. Surely, they now regret their choices considering the negative attention it's receiving. (NY Times and so forth)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153241030213229812006-07-18T17:43:00.000+01:002006-07-18T17:43:00.000+01:00I haven't read every comment so this might have al...I haven't read every comment so this might have already been said,but Jake did actually approve the in the rear joke.Lance asked him before the show and Jake said he loved it?I don't think an in the rear joke is funny ,and why even bother at a sports awards,or anywhere of that matter?I have mixed feelings about it.Anybody else?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153238399825949082006-07-18T16:59:00.000+01:002006-07-18T16:59:00.000+01:00The NYT article:New York Times (July 18, 2006)And ...The NYT article:<BR/><BR/>New York Times (July 18, 2006)<BR/><BR/>And the ESPY for Bad Taste Goes to ... <BR/>By RICHARD SANDOMIR<BR/><BR/>When you don’t expect to hear certain things in a familiar environment, it’s easy to be surprised. Your head turns. Your stomach flips. Your ears quiver. I can’t remember hearing anal-sex jokes on ESPN, so I was stunned to hear Lance Armstrong make one in his monologue at the ESPY Awards show televised Sunday night. The one-liner by Armstrong, the cyclist-turned-host, wasn’t uttered willy-nilly, but to Jake Gyllenhaal, the co-star of “Brokeback Mountain,” who was seated in the front row at the Kodak Theater in Hollywood.<BR/><BR/>Armstrong got a huge guffaw, and a few gasps, out of the tasteless line, but the surprise was that it survived the editing of the tape. It felt so out of context for a program that followed the Mets’ 13-7 win over the Cubs, although it would have been apt in some areas of Yankee Stadium.<BR/><BR/>It would have been unacceptable for one “SportsCenter” anchor to make the same crack to another on the air, yet it was O.K. at 9:45 p.m. Eastern during a program in which athletes and Hollywood stars mingle? It’s fine if you’ve brought Carmen Electra, Ludacris and LeBron James together, but not during a bowl game or the N.C.A.A. cheerleading championships?<BR/><BR/>It would seem so. John Walsh, ESPN’s executive editor and long-time journalistic guide, said that through the first 13 ESPYs, the ESPN empire learned it had to stay positive while celebrating sports and not insult people.<BR/><BR/>I’m not sure where green-lighting Armstrong’s one-liner fits within the ESPY curriculum of lessons learned. But the rules of propriety must be different when you’re trying to be cool outside stadiums and arenas.<BR/><BR/>“When you’re trying to attract the best, most contemporary and most talented people from the entertainment community, they have an expectation of being attached to a show that takes risks,” Walsh said.<BR/><BR/>That attitude apparently sanctions the airing of Armstrong’s crude joke, and, as we scale ESPN’s highbrow mountain, cracks about Armstrong’s remaining testicle. (He is a survivor of testicular cancer.) You have to wonder if someone explained all this to the young Afghan girls who were honored by the ESPYs with the Arthur Ashe Courage Award for defying Taliban authorities to play soccer.<BR/><BR/>You need not be a prude to believe that there are more appropriate places for such language than an awards presentation that celebrates sports. <BR/><BR/>But should we view crudeness as evidence of entertainment-world risk — or as a failure of the creative process? The program had a writing staff, and this was the best cutting-edge humor they had? The program was taped last week, and no one at ESPN had the good taste to rule that anal-sex and gay jokes (Armstrong followed one with the other) exhibited a lack of decorum?<BR/><BR/>Walsh said the anal-sex joke was among the three or four most-discussed items as the ESPYs production team analyzed what to excise for the two-hour broadcast. Finally, it was deemed a “reasonable risk.”<BR/><BR/>The program cannot be dismissed completely for a few words spoken by Armstrong, hard as they are to expunge from memory. The Ashe award is always moving; so was the story of a high school basketball team from Marrero, La., as it recovered from the devastation of Hurricane Katrina. <BR/><BR/>Armstrong’s plea for more financing for cancer research was heartfelt, as was the acceptance speech of one ESPY winner, Jason McElwain, the autistic teenager and high school basketball team manager who suited up for a game last February and sank six 3-pointers on his way to scoring 20 points.<BR/><BR/>But much of the rest was like a mediocre edition of “Saturday Night Live,” pairing Armstrong in sketches with Ben Stiller and Will Ferrell.<BR/><BR/>This, then, was another episode in the ongoing battle of Good ESPN and Bad ESPN, juggling inspirational stories with the fluffy and the profane. <BR/><BR/>Good ESPN produces “Outside the Lines” while Bad ESPN creates the now-dead “ESPN Hollywood” daily series, a howlingly awful effort to blend sports and entertainment celebrity news.<BR/><BR/>Good ESPN televised Sunday’s well-produced ballgame for six and a half innings — with super slow-motion replays that gave terrific portraits of Mets and Cubs batters connecting with the ball — before it gave way to Bad ESPN’s excessive promotion for the ESPYs. <BR/><BR/>In the bottom of the seventh, the bottom-line scoreboard was replaced by a constant alert (total elapsed time: 32 minutes 17 seconds) that the ESPYs were “Coming Up Next.” <BR/><BR/>All interest in the results of other games in baseball or other sports was to cease immediately as per Bad ESPN fiat. The announcer Jon Miller also had to hype the ESPYs with outright pitches (“We’re one out away from the ESPYs,” he said), by links to a nominee (the Mets’ David Wright) or by a suggestion for an ESPY for best performance by a 47-year-old (Julio Franco).<BR/><BR/>Walsh said the reason for such overboard (my word) promotion was to lead those who had watched the ESPYs’ red-carpet show on ESPN2 through the end of the game, which delayed the awards program. “When you’ve invested that much in that kind of show,” he said, “we’ll do everything we can.”<BR/><BR/>ESPN’s power is such that on nights like Sunday its nickname should be rewritten to be “The Worldwide Leader of Itself.”<BR/><BR/>E-mail: sportsbiz@nytimes.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153232222255090352006-07-18T15:17:00.000+01:002006-07-18T15:17:00.000+01:00The New York Times article was very illuminating! ...The New York Times article was very illuminating! And, at least IMVHO, it gives a really clear indication of how deliberate and complex the process was in terms of how the writers, producers and "host" interacted in shaping the show. It's very apparent to me, the "gay humor" theme was going to be foundational to most of the show's 'comedy' and skits. It is also clearer to me, that while pro forma, Lance may have asked Jake if it was OK?, Lance wasn't really asking for guidance, he was asking for an opinion. If Jake had taken the stand that it wasn't OK, would we have seen a manufactured controversy? "Gyllenhaal bows out of ESPYs?" Or "Gyllenhaal protests ESPYs?" It almost makes me wonder. And, yeah, maybe I'm a bit(!) paranoid....but did they invite Jake to appear, bcz they decided to go with gay humor? Or did they decide to go "gay" because of Jake's indentification with BBM? My reaction to the Times article made me ponder these things. The person who really did have the option, of course, was Lance. Maybe he had to do the first joke.... but the eyes front comment was gratuitous. He could have just not said it. And he'd have gotten away with it. And the jock producers at ESPN could have excised the "sicko" remark, but they are not at a level of consciousness where they even considered it might be interpreted as offensive. ESPN is cable. It is broadcast in other places besides the US. I sincerely hope the viewing audience for this show is really small. And I hope it all just fades away...quickly. The very last thing I want to see is Lance embroiled in any controversy, where Jake's put in a position to defend him. Ugh! It would have a serious affect on my ability to keep my lunch down. These are my last delusional ramblings on the subject.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153221922277117892006-07-18T12:25:00.000+01:002006-07-18T12:25:00.000+01:00What 2.47 said, and what squallcloud said (cubed)....What 2.47 said, and what squallcloud said (cubed).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153218614560829052006-07-18T11:30:00.000+01:002006-07-18T11:30:00.000+01:00Good point anon 9:31 he was hardly the lamb out to...Good point anon 9:31 he was hardly the lamb out to slaughter but there is a lot of pressure to conform in Hollywood and publicity is publicity I suppose. *sigh* I wish people would see the film for what it is and stop trying to laugh at it. Such a touching and amazing story. Also, what anon 2:47 said.<BR/><BR/>*sigh* Jake looked so pretty.JadziaDragonRiderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14016907011781007934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153216074635703632006-07-18T10:47:00.000+01:002006-07-18T10:47:00.000+01:00Why would it be sick to assume that anyone liked i...Why would it be sick to assume that anyone liked it in the rear unless you believe liking it in the rear is sick. It's homophobia.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153200582630999152006-07-18T06:29:00.001+01:002006-07-18T06:29:00.001+01:00Bobbie said: Lance's "you sick people" comment pis...Bobbie said: Lance's "you sick people" comment pissed me off. So now being gay is sick? <BR/><BR/>=== No, no, Lance wasn't calling gays sick, the remark was directed to the audience. He was calling the audience sick - having dirty minds - for assuming he was saying Jake liked it in the rear (end) when he "really" meant rear of the theater. Of course the audience assumed exactly what he wanted them to assume. It's a common comedian's trick.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153200556961270242006-07-18T06:29:00.000+01:002006-07-18T06:29:00.000+01:00Apparently the people at the New York Times weren'...Apparently the people at the New York Times weren't too thrilled either at the jokes.<BR/><BR/>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/18/sports/18sandomir.htmlMr. Mhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07111642047251655351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153197063310146272006-07-18T05:31:00.000+01:002006-07-18T05:31:00.000+01:00You guys act like Jake doesn't have a mind of how ...You guys act like Jake doesn't have a mind of how own and is a helpless victim in this. I don't see him that way at all. Imo, if you didn't like the jokes, you would have to blame Jake just as much as Lance here for agreeing to take part in it.<BR/><BR/>As others mentioned, these shows are always scripted and Jake knew what was going to be said. Lance's jokes, Jake walking out and carrying the book.. Jake was in on it and agreed to it. I think everyone is taking it too seriously. <BR/><BR/>Should Jake not have been comfortable with it he could have easily said to Lance or to his agent "Well, I think that's too much, it might make people uncomfortable." which he obviously didn't say. In fact, he didn't have to take part at all. I didn't really find the jokes very funny myself, but given the tone of this particular award show, (male driven sports awards which usually have that stupid macho slant) they probably felt the jokes would work their way into the entertainment and the response would be good. It was definitely all very calculated.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153188166037006362006-07-18T03:02:00.000+01:002006-07-18T03:02:00.000+01:00I don't know. I want Jake to move on and stop havi...I don't know. I want Jake to move on and stop having to be subjected to this bullshit but in a way I feel like his nonchalance about it is really empowering. Being bi, it's nice that a hot celeb doesn't feel the need to "Deny! Deny! DENY!" rumors of his aleged bisexuality but has fun with it. I just hate the assholes who take advantage. For instance it's totally fine and hot hot hot for Jakey to do sexy pictorals for men's mags but enduring undending Ranch Hand Job jokes and even last nights "liked it in the rear... you sickos!" bullshit is not what I want him to have to go through because I'm sure the Ladies Who Lunch that run his career are none too happy and their probably started to get way pressury about it. <BR/><BR/>I hope this whoel ordeal doesnt' sour him to gay causes and his gay fanbase. :o(JadziaDragonRiderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14016907011781007934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153169738182981702006-07-17T21:55:00.000+01:002006-07-17T21:55:00.000+01:00Btw, Jake looks just boootiful in those pics.... L...Btw, Jake looks just boootiful in those pics.... Like someone said in an earlier topic - can that man hang a suit or what?! DAMN.cinahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06902165640305276490noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153169289154246552006-07-17T21:48:00.000+01:002006-07-17T21:48:00.000+01:00Smurfeyschmoo said, ". . . I was a teensy bit piss...Smurfeyschmoo said, ". . . I was a teensy bit pissed that they didn't show Jake in the audience more."<BR/><BR/><BR/>And wouldn't have shown him at all if Lance hadn't made the jokes!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153168492497963032006-07-17T21:34:00.000+01:002006-07-17T21:34:00.000+01:00I just want to say "welcome" to all the new names ...<B>I just want to say "welcome" to all the new names here. It's nice to see less people posting as anonymous! :-)</B><BR/><BR/>Ditto! its always nice to put a name to a comment, you are all very welcome.The Chemistry Guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14980961048899885071noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1153166362627537542006-07-17T20:59:00.000+01:002006-07-17T20:59:00.000+01:00At the core, aren't we all just Jake fans? That's ...<I>At the core, aren't we all just Jake fans? That's why we're here! We should get back to that.</I><BR/><BR/>I agree with you PG :) and thanks for the report!Agneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18082350363836016124noreply@blogger.com