tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post114950280594364685..comments2024-02-17T09:02:22.902+00:00Comments on Jake Watch | Stalking Jake Gyllenhaal Daily: OUR FIRST FIGHT. IT WAS BOUND TO HAPPEN SOONER OR LATERbritpopbabyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04444074574966465657noreply@blogger.comBlogger83125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149701332091764612006-06-07T18:28:00.000+01:002006-06-07T18:28:00.000+01:00Anon 6:58, you don't have to be a blogger to post ...Anon 6:58, you don't have to be a blogger to post under a name. There is the "other" option, where you can write whatever name u like, so when you post again we can identify you.. It's as easy as picking the "anonymous" option,only that the other is better for the communication on the blog..My opinion.mrs_dallowayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03970160938991513702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149688720651833292006-06-07T14:58:00.000+01:002006-06-07T14:58:00.000+01:00I'm not sure, because I'm not particularly fond of...I'm not sure, because I'm not particularly fond of Blogger, which is partly why I don't want to be registered with it -- but I believe that if Britpopbaby herself dislikes anonymous posters, she can turn off that option. If so, then it's up to her, rather than anyone else.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149675409437109712006-06-07T11:16:00.000+01:002006-06-07T11:16:00.000+01:00I seem to have missed this whole discussion but I ...I seem to have missed this whole discussion but I so agree with what Kokodee said - all those 'anonymous' girls and boys should get themselves a NAME!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149632426030787932006-06-06T23:20:00.000+01:002006-06-06T23:20:00.000+01:00Good gracious! What is with all these anonymouses?...Good gracious! What is with all these anonymouses???<BR/>Y'all need to get regular names or somethin' and for goodness sake quit arguing over someone who probably dosen't know you exist and won't be sleeping with you anytime soon!The Chemistry Guruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14980961048899885071noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149627856379690702006-06-06T22:04:00.000+01:002006-06-06T22:04:00.000+01:00Well, well, well, seems that someone is trying aga...<I>Well, well, well, seems that someone is trying again to misunderstand here.</I><BR/><BR/>I didn't try to misunderstand. If anything I was trying to understand where you were coming from because I didn't agree.<BR/><BR/><I>Firstly: in your first quote you wilfully deleted my phrase “you may have your reasons”, just because it makes your statement a bit more plausible?</I><BR/><BR/>No, actually I wasn't going to include all of the statement and then decided to so when I went back down to copy/paste more of it, I must have missed that part of it and not noticed. I still don't care for the label of "melodramatic" just because someone is offended by something that you don't see as offensive.<BR/><BR/><I>Secondly: to assume BPB was having problems with JG possibly being gay is about as valid as calling her a racist because she was impersonating a Naomi with her issue, and that is what I was trying to make clear with my contribution.</I><BR/><BR/>I understand what you were trying to make clear (and I do agree in that I don't think anyone was being homophobic), it was just I had a problem with the way you went about doing so.<BR/> <BR/><I>I never claimed all gays dislike boobs, but definitely all gays I know are not into them.</I><BR/><BR/>Actually you did seem to claim all gay men dislike boobs based on the gay men you know that aren't into them because you flat out said "The latest, very amusing argument is, that gays would look at boobs, with the same facial expression as every straight male would do, which is just so not true, if you are really into the same sex" which would imply that you felt it's not true at all that there are gay men who also like boobs and may look at them (and touch them) in the same ways as even straight men. Maybe it's just your wording that made it seem like that's what you were saying. <BR/><BR/><I>I also know that some of you are quite quick to call the homophobe card when some issues are not to their liking, but I wont play along that game, because that would be just too easy, wouldn’t it.</I><BR/><BR/>I HATE when people call the "homophobe card" at every little thing. That said, I also can understand when some things are a little more sensitive for some people based on life experiences.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149623941318134412006-06-06T20:59:00.000+01:002006-06-06T20:59:00.000+01:00Certain cotton sock and footwear combinations cert...Certain cotton sock and footwear combinations certainly have a lethal potential, where a man's erotic appeal is concerned. I am talking here about constant, utterly unrepentant clog-wearing. Combined with thick, dorky, math-major white cotton socks. I mean, such that Jake clomps around in the things blatantly, as if he's offering some form of wordless defiance to us all: "Yah, take THIS, you nasty blogging JakeWatch readers. I'll wear any damn fugly thing on my feet that I want to. And you'll look at it & like it! And while I'm at it, I'm going to grow facial hair like a member of ZZ Top. I owe you nothing, nothing." <BR/><BR/>Then, I wouldn't love him anymore. Heath? Oh, Heath?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149615724380942602006-06-06T18:42:00.000+01:002006-06-06T18:42:00.000+01:00"According to my small understanding of "mirror la..."According to my small understanding of "mirror laws", telling you you're right should now mean the discussion is ended - right?"<BR/><BR/>Of course not, lol. BTW: Mirror law: You see yourself reflected, means you transfer your feelings unknowingly, thinking the way you feel is the way the other person is feeling. Thanks for complimenting my English, but I know my flaws, as should you by now. I did not intend to imply you are a lesbian, you see. And now I would also be grateful if our discussion was over, if thats fine with you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149615660374156682006-06-06T18:41:00.000+01:002006-06-06T18:41:00.000+01:00SC: Understood, one likes what one likes. [To put ...SC: Understood, one likes what one likes. [To put it bluntly, the c*nt wants what it wants.] I don't really want being part of heterosexist oppression within the U.S. entertainment industry. I don't want concerns about marketing to my demographic to keep any guy fearfully closeted. But, if it turned out Jakey were gay, I'd feel sort of like Cher in "Clueless" when she realizes the cool guy to whom she's been so attracted is gay. She's completely cool with it, and he's still the same great guy. She still loves hanging out with him. But she just doesn't lust after him anymore, she's not nearly so entranced by him. And eventually, she moves on.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149614883049921782006-06-06T18:28:00.000+01:002006-06-06T18:28:00.000+01:00Curious. I am a straight girl. Not bi, straight....Curious. I am a straight girl. Not bi, straight. Why did you think I would be a gay girl? Because I was defending gayness?<BR/><BR/>Rhetorical questions, btw.<BR/><BR/>You're right, it may be a language issue, though your English is excellent. According to my small understanding of "mirror laws", telling you you're right should now mean the discussion is ended - right?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149614250445945462006-06-06T18:17:00.000+01:002006-06-06T18:17:00.000+01:00And sorry I'm a girl.Gotcha! Grin away. 9:34 AM Ye...And sorry I'm a girl.<BR/><BR/>Gotcha! Grin away. <BR/><BR/>9:34 AM <BR/><BR/>Yeah, so maybe you are, but the other guy, as in other gay, who replied to me first, was a guy as he stated he was gay. <BR/>"Do you know the mirror-laws, I am grinning here. What gave you the impression I thought you were the other guy? Just curious?"<BR/>That´s what I wrote, where do I state you are male? Tell me, please, and who for gods sake is trying very, very hard here to prove something just to make the point and get some win-win-feeling? Maybe it all comes down to English not being my mother-tongue.<BR/>SC: I remember, and I thought that someone overreacted, but you sure got some help, didn´t you? And my objections sure enough did have nothing to do with him being whatever he likes to be, which is really fine with me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149613801609506032006-06-06T18:10:00.000+01:002006-06-06T18:10:00.000+01:00And sorry I'm a girl.Gotcha! Grin away. 9:34 AM Ye...And sorry I'm a girl.<BR/><BR/>Gotcha! Grin away. <BR/><BR/>9:34 AM <BR/><BR/>Yeah, so maybe you are, but the other guy, as in other gay, who replied to me first, was a guy as he stated he was gay. <BR/>"Do you know the mirror-laws, I am grinning here. What gave you the impression I thought you were the other guy? Just curious?"<BR/>That´s what I wrote, where do I state you are male? Tell me, please, and who for gods sake is trying very, very hard here to prove something just to make the point. Maybe it all comes down to English not being my mother-tongue.<BR/>SC: I remember, and I thought that someone overreacted, but you sure got some help, didn´t you?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149612371298555852006-06-06T17:46:00.000+01:002006-06-06T17:46:00.000+01:00How 'bout all the anons give yourselves names real...How 'bout all the anons give yourselves names real quick. It's simple. Wanna keep you all strait in my head. <BR/><BR/>I actually was told to shut up or go away by a poster after making a mild comment about Jakey with the boys but right after that someone else defended me. I think there is a lot of ire on both sides, but this blogs official stance and most of the regulars are accepting of folks. Doesn't make a lick of sense to get so pissed. We don't know him. I usually dont' speculate just fantasize. <BR/><BR/>The reason why there cannot be an A List actor who is out and gay (If anything he's bi, because he did love him some Kirsten.) is for the reasons stated by anons 4:40 5:44. A lot of women would find it a turn off. Of course His People aren't taking into account the legions of women who woudl find it a HUGE turn on like me and Molly Simms (modeltress from "Las Vegas"). Maybe it would all balance out but then he'd also lose his most valued demo and that's Males ages 18 - 34. <BR/><BR/>(Keep in mind I'm not disparaging either anons mentioned. What you like is what you like. Just tryign to make a point.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149611684108602512006-06-06T17:34:00.000+01:002006-06-06T17:34:00.000+01:00And sorry I'm a girl.Gotcha! Grin away.And sorry I'm a girl.<BR/><BR/>Gotcha! Grin away.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149611273733322002006-06-06T17:27:00.000+01:002006-06-06T17:27:00.000+01:00"but I am NOT the person who responded to you orig..."but I am NOT the person who responded to you originally, as you seem to believe."<BR/><BR/>Do you know the mirror-laws, I am grinning here. What gave you the impression I thought you were the other guy? Just curious?<BR/>Sorry, if I don´t fit into your inner pattern of me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149610325433747232006-06-06T17:12:00.000+01:002006-06-06T17:12:00.000+01:00I am fine, actually! And I am the person who took...I am fine, actually! And I am the person who took you up on a few things immediately above, but I am NOT the person who responded to you originally, as you seem to believe. That's one very simple incidence of what I am trying to say about your tone. Anyway, pax, I am done with this subject - it's a fun blog.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149609267531386912006-06-06T16:54:00.000+01:002006-06-06T16:54:00.000+01:00"5.43, ex 1.10, you sound a little aggressive. Hav..."5.43, ex 1.10, you sound a little aggressive. Have you considered that the reason you are sometimes misunderstood has something to do with the tone in which you express your opinions, and the vocabulary you use ("subsuming" bisexual men into gays? would you have used "subsuming" if you were talking about categorising bisexual men with straight men?) also your idea that your opinion is the only correct one. Life isn't that simple."<BR/><BR/>Yes of course I would have used subsuming categorising straight and bisexual. I don´t think this sounds aggressive or offensive, only if you are already inclined to think that or are biased.<BR/>Could you explain where you got the impression or where I stated that my opinion is the only correct one? If you are assuming that I am indeed allergic to people trying to bully someone by pulling the homophobe or racist card if the subject discussed is not going according to their intentions, you are right. But that is not what you aimed at, or is it? And believe me, I really know that life is not simple, not with sexual issues or anything else, which by the way does not mean I am bitter. I quite enjoy my life and I enjoyed the discussed issue here, which is something some of you are obviously not doing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149607424123308042006-06-06T16:23:00.000+01:002006-06-06T16:23:00.000+01:005.43, ex 1.10, you sound a little aggressive. Hav...5.43, ex 1.10, you sound a little aggressive. Have you considered that the reason you are sometimes misunderstood has something to do with the tone in which you express your opinions, and the vocabulary you use ("subsuming" bisexual men into gays? would you have used "subsuming" if you were talking about categorising bisexual men with straight men?) also your idea that your opinion is the only correct one. Life isn't that simple.<BR/><BR/>Back to the merriment.<BR/><BR/>I agree with 5.44 about things that can put me off Jake, apart from F) which I would be fine with (and earlier poster, I am not a bit masochistic).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149606484195050332006-06-06T16:08:00.000+01:002006-06-06T16:08:00.000+01:00I'm so dillusional that nothing could stop me lovi...I'm so dillusional that nothing could stop me loving Jake unless he reversed over my cat in his humungous Mercedes Benz.britpopbabyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04444074574966465657noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149597873658076162006-06-06T13:44:00.000+01:002006-06-06T13:44:00.000+01:00What would it take to make us all stop loving Jake...What would it take to make us all stop loving Jake, I wonder? For me, these might be deal-breakers, if they occurred in any combination:<BR/><BR/>A) Fifty-pound weight gain or more (a la Brando)<BR/>B) Face disappears into a mass of hair (i.e., old Testament style beard)<BR/>C) Habitual clog-wearing<BR/>D) Registers as a Republican<BR/>E) Becomes born-again or joins a Hasidic sect<BR/>F) All of the above, plus he comes out as gay (which would seriously conflict with D & E, but I have a feeling that's been done already by someone, somewhere). Others on the board can change "gay" here for "straight," as appropriate.<BR/>G) Reveals that his eyes are actually brown, and it's been colored contact lenses, all along.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149597780207324402006-06-06T13:43:00.000+01:002006-06-06T13:43:00.000+01:00Well, well, well, seems that someone is trying aga...Well, well, well, seems that someone is trying again to misunderstand here.<BR/>Firstly: in your first quote you wilfully deleted my phrase “you may have your reasons”, just because it makes your statement a bit more plausible?<BR/>Secondly: to assume BPB was having problems with JG possibly being gay is about as valid as calling her a racist because she was impersonating a Naomi with her issue, and that is what I was trying to make clear with my contribution.<BR/>It is indeed strange that some, and I repeat again as before: SOME gays are very sensitive with remarks being made about the subject of gayness even when it is obvious that someone is joking, but are very insensitive when it comes down to assuming someone is gay or outright calling someones behaviour, judged by photos, being gay, and that is what I think is to have double standards. <BR/><BR/>“Actually I don't think "gaydar" is entirely made up. However, that said, it's really only "accurate" when meeting someone in person.”<BR/><BR/>Right, and we are talking internet here, aren´t we.<BR/><BR/>“Well I'd say, first of all, that's discounting bisexual men.”<BR/><BR/>Well, I don´t subsume bisexual men as being gay.<BR/>And I don’t even start to speculate seriously about a couple being photographed at some event, because that is a complete waste of time. Although I do joke about it, as was intended here, because that is just fun, at least for me, and it seems some others also think it´s just amusing.<BR/><BR/>Even if this is quite irrelevant: I am sure you know a lot more gays than I do, but: the gays I know just don´t like boobs, at least that´s what they say. I never claimed all gays dislike boobs, but definitely all gays I know are not into them. <BR/><BR/>Again some of you may have their reasons to their righteousness, but in this situation it was not called for, and I stand by that. I also know that some of you are quite quick to call the homophobe card when some issues are not to their liking, but I wont play along that game, because that would be just too easy, wouldn’t it. We are talking internet here and you are right, it´s easy to misunderstand each other. Although it is quite simple to wilfully misunderstand to serve a purpose and that is something I severely dislike. <BR/>If you wanted to contribute, you could have been funny, anon 4.59, instead of being holier than thou, and pulling the same lame old homophobe card. I suppose quite a lot of us here have fewer problems with gays than you seem to have with some straight people. <BR/>What about some joke on that pictures, I give you an example: You could have said that this showing off with Eva was just a major trick acted masterfully by Jakey, to scare his lovely mum senseless by trying to pretend to hook up with an older Latina, so that she will be quite relieved when he takes her to meet his cute Jewish boyfriend.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149596830510476442006-06-06T13:27:00.000+01:002006-06-06T13:27:00.000+01:00I'm anon 4:36, thank you, anon 4:03; eloquently st...I'm anon 4:36, thank you, anon 4:03; eloquently stated indeed. We sound like robots with our numbers, don't we? :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149595143192565612006-06-06T12:59:00.000+01:002006-06-06T12:59:00.000+01:004.03, thanks for answering 1.10 so eloquently and ...4.03, thanks for answering 1.10 so eloquently and saving me the trouble.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149594671474567262006-06-06T12:51:00.000+01:002006-06-06T12:51:00.000+01:00Can the Republicans sink any lower? I feared they ...Can the Republicans sink any lower? I feared they would dig deep in the scum bucket to try to win. They are totally shameless.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149594034190039572006-06-06T12:40:00.000+01:002006-06-06T12:40:00.000+01:00I'd say that wtbgirl's remarks come closest to my ...I'd say that wtbgirl's remarks come closest to my own feelings about Jake and the gay question. Though not exactly. Gay is normal, gay is great. (The Republicans are, as usual, behaving like a bunch of assholes RE the proposed amendment.) But if I find out that Jake's gay, it's going to seriously interfere with my straight female fantasy life. But then I'd just move on & find a straight boy to fantasize about. Lots of handsome actors out there starting careers, every day, there's sure to be one who appeals. Unlike some others, I don't want to imagine Jake with anyone but me, so I wouldn't get off on thinking of him with some guy. But that's just me, personally. Turn-ons are very personal & idiosyncratic. Sexual attraction can be very fragile -- on Jake's part, even a big weight gain & habitual clog-wearing would endanger it. Gay would end it completely. Though I'd still think he's a beauty & a fine actor, it would be kind of masochistic to be dreaming of someone who's thinking only about other guys.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25249736.post-1149591986017880702006-06-06T12:06:00.000+01:002006-06-06T12:06:00.000+01:00Maybe he was starting at something else and the pi...<I>Maybe he was starting at something else and the picture takers just happened to snap it at the right moment</I><BR/><BR/>By this I meant, <B>starting to look at something else</B>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com